BY RICARDO CAMPELLO – Guest Author
A major Brazilian newspaper has reported that the Brazilian Federal Government wants to exclude from Brazil’s commitments under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) Brazilian procurements for defense and health-related goods and services (link to the article in Portuguese). It is also said that, for now, Brazil`s accession proposal contemplates only procurements by the federal government. State and local governments’ procurements would not be included.
Compared to other procurement defense markets, Brazil`s is not that big. In 2019, the budget of the Federal Government`s Ministry of Defense was approximately USD 25 billion, but more than half of this was used to pay personnel expenses (according to the Federal Government`s website: http://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/funcoes/05-defesa-nacional?ano=2019). The money spent with goods and services (not necessarily weapons or defense-specific) was around USD 3 billion.
GWU Law LLM Candidate
The budget of the Brazilian Ministry of Health is bigger — around USD 35 billion in 2019 (according to the Federal Government`s website: http://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/funcoes/10-saude?ano=2019). This is due mainly to Brazil`s public healthcare system, called “SUS,” under which citizens are entitled to receive almost any treatment for free (including drugs, medical devices and medical procedures). A substantial portion of these funds goes to pay for healthcare-related goods and services. It is a huge procurement market.
The official reason for the exclusion of these sectors is that they are too strategic. But strategic how? The newspaper piece does not clarify. Is it a question of national security strategy? Or are these sectors strategic for industrial policy purposes? And is this true for absolutely all procurements of these departments of the Federal government? Also, why would enhancing competition and, consequently, reducing corruption and the government`s procurement costs – all potential outcomes from Brazil`s accession to GPA – not be desired in these strategic sectors? The GPA has flexibilities for developing countries to protect their industrial bases by making the transition to the GPA’s free markets smoother. Why not use these tools instead of excluding entire procurement sectors from coverage?
Finally, the newspaper piece also noted that discussions regarding GPA coverage between the Federal Government and GPA members is just part of the necessary negotiations. Brazil’s Congress will have to approve Brazil`s accession to the agreement as well. As one can see, the Brazilian government’s announcement that it will seek to join the GPA is just the beginning of a long and complex negotiation process, both internationally and nationally. There is a lot more to come.
Editor’s Note: For the United States, trade with its allies in defense items – materiel, services and research/development – is normally opened (and opened comprehensively) through separate reciprocal defense procurement agreements. Thus, while the United States may resist Brazil’s efforts to protect its public health markets under the GPA, the United States may prove willing to reserve defense issues to negotiation of a separate Brazil–U.S. reciprocal defense procurement agreement, which has been raised as a possibility by industry.
