Administrative Conference of the United States: Project Page
May 1, 2020 Report by Professor Yukins available from ACUS
This page is produced in conjunction with a study commissioned by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), of agency-level bid protests. The study was led by Professor Christopher Yukins (cyukins@law.gwu.edu), George Washington University Law School. The ACUS project is assessing agency-level bid protest procedures under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and agency-specific regulations. The report produced by Professor Yukins to support the ACUS study drew on a number of interviews (interview briefing) of those experienced (both private- and public-sector) in agency-level bid protests. Professor Yukins’ report analyzed agency regulations governing various aspects of agency-level bid protests, including review above the level of the contracting officer, standard clauses governing protest procedures, and the exchange of information during protests. Professor Yukins’ report offered a series of options for agency-level bid protest procedures, and recommendations regarding when specific procedures may be appropriate for adoption.
The ACUS report was cited in the conference report accompanying H.R. 6395, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2021, Section 886, which said that the ACUS report should be considered as part of a follow-on study by the U.S. Department of Defense, due by September 1, 2021:
“The conferees emphasize the potential benefits of a robust agency-level bid protest process. Accordingly, [a commissioned study by the Defense Department] should evaluate the following factors for agency-level bid protests: prevalence, timeliness, outcomes, availability, and reliability of data on protest activities; consistency of protest processes among the military Services; and any other challenges that affect the expediency of such protest processes. In doing so, the study should review existing law, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and agency policies and procedures and solicit input from across the DOD and industry stakeholders. The conferees note that an academic study recently examined the agency-level bid protest process at various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, and reported on that study to the Administrative Conference of the United States. The conferees direct the Department to consider these recommendations among those it might make to improve the expediency, timeliness, transparency, and consistency of agency-level bid protests. Not later than September 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees with a report detailing the results and recommendations of the study, together with such comments as the Secretary determines appropriate.”
The report authored by Professor Yukins is also scheduled for publication in the Public Contract Law Journal.
This page is not authored or maintained by the Administrative Conference of the United States, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Administrative Conference or the federal government.
ACUS Project Page, which includes:
- ACUS draft recommendation (copy here)
- Professor Yukins’ draft report (copy here)
- Links to ACUS public meetings on the ACUS draft recommendation, scheduled to be held online on July 10 & 27, 2020
Public Meeting Held on Project
ABA Bid Protest Committee Meeting – Agency-Level Bid Protests
Tuesday, October 15, 2019 – Registration 11:45 am
GWU Law School – 2000 H Street NW – Faculty Conference Center (Burns 5th floor)
The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is undertaking a study of agency-level bid protests, summarized here and coordinated by Professor Christopher Yukins (George Washington University Law School), with research assistance by GWU Law student Benjamin Smith. An open meeting of the American Bar Association (ABA) Bid Protest Committee will be held at GWU Law School at noon on October 15, 2019, to discuss possible reforms of agency-level bid protest procedures under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and agency-specific regulations. Lunch will be provided.
The recording of the event is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq7vdWzuSFM&feature=youtu.be
Note: This meeting is not sponsored by the Administrative Conference of the United States.
Federal Acquisition Regulation
FAR 33.103 (61 Fed. Reg. 39219 (July 26, 1996))
Executive Order
Agency-Specific Materials
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)
- Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Department of State
- Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- General Services Administration (GSA)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Resources
- Advisory Panel on Streamlining and Codifying Acquisition Regulations [Section 809 Panel], Volume 3 of 3 Summary of Recommendations
- American Bar Association (ABA) Model Procurement Code (MPC) for State and Local Governments
- Mark v. Arena, Brian Persons, Irv Blickstein, Mary E. Chenoweth, Gordon T. Lee, David Luckey & Abby Schendt, Assessing Bid Protests of U.S. Department of Defense Procurements: Identifying Issues, Trends and Drivers (RAND Corp. 2018)
- David H. Carpenter & Moshe Schwartz, Government Contract Bid Protests: Analysis of Legal Processes and Recent Developments (Congressional Research Service No. R45080, Nov. 28, 2018)
- Merle M. DeLancey Jr. & Michael Joseph Montalbano, Agency Protests: An Emerging Tool and Potential Threat for Contractors (Blank Rome, July 15, 2019).
- The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School, Contract Attorneys Deskbook 2019, Ch. 18A, Bid Protests (July 2019)
- David T. Ralston Jr. & Frank S. Murray Jr., Government Contracts: Agency-Level Bid Protests (Thomson Reuters – Practical Law April 21, 2017).
- Michael J. Schaengold, T. Michael Guiffré & Elizabeth M. Gill, Choice of Forum for Federal Government Contract Bid Protests, 18 Fed. Cir. Bar J. 243 (2009).
- Eric Troff, Agency-Level Bid Protest Reform: Time for a Little Less Efficiency? (Apr. 2005)
- James Tucker, A Road Less Traveled: Agency-Level Protests (Morrison & Foerster, Sept. 26, 2016), http://govcon.mofo.com/protests-litigation/agency-level-protests/ .
- Christopher Yukins, Administrative Conference of the United States Launches Study of Agency-Level Bid Protests, 61 Gov. Contr. ¶ 239 (Aug. 21, 2019), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441437